There's a weird wrinkle in IDP scoring, where a full, solo, sack will count as the aggregate of a tackle, tackle for a loss and a sack. But half sacks are only awarded half the points for a sack, and no partial credit for the tackle. Is there any reason as to why this happens? Is this just something dumb that the NFL does and doesn't even notice?
I think it is the NFL. Tackle for loss is different depnding on where you look too, ESPN for instance takes sacks out and calls it stuffs. Consistency in statistics on the defensive side of the ball is long over do from providers.
Seriously. I wish I had the option to keep all of the stats separate. I simply want tackles to be 1.5, TFLs to be 3 and sacks to be 4.5. I don't want my half sacks to be worth .75 instead of the 2.25 you'd get in a normal system.
ChancefWed 8/29/18 2:08 PM
There's a weird wrinkle in IDP scoring, where a full, solo, sack will count as the aggregate of a tackle, tackle for a loss and a sack. But half sacks are only awarded half the points for a sack, and no partial credit for the tackle. Is there any reason as to why this happens? Is this just something dumb that the NFL does and doesn't even notice?
NingDynastyThu 8/30/18 5:29 PM
I think it is the NFL. Tackle for loss is different depnding on where you look too, ESPN for instance takes sacks out and calls it stuffs. Consistency in statistics on the defensive side of the ball is long over do from providers.
ChancefThu 8/30/18 6:05 PM
Seriously. I wish I had the option to keep all of the stats separate. I simply want tackles to be 1.5, TFLs to be 3 and sacks to be 4.5. I don't want my half sacks to be worth .75 instead of the 2.25 you'd get in a normal system.
NingDynastyThu 8/30/18 7:05 PM
I know exactly what you mean.