1. The start of the MLB is getting closer, and I still see the same issues—many players remain as free agents, such as Roki Sasaki, who is a starting pitcher tomorrow.
2. It is known that Clay Holmes will be a starter, but the platform still lists him as a reliever, which affects his scoring. Right now, as an internal rule, he is not eligible until he is listed as SP or P.
Truth be told, I didn't think this topic would generate so much controversy. I apologize to the community; there are people who have been here for a long time. I wasn't aware of the three openings to use him as an SP, but there are leagues where the scoring for RP and SP is different. For example, 1 IP for an SP is 2 points, while for an RP it's 3. Imagine those who asked for Holmes—he will always score above average. Maybe your leagues aren't like that, but mine and many others are, which wouldn't be fair. That's why I asked for that change. Last year, we had to wait for Crochet, Little, Hicks, and even Miller, who took more than the 8 RP outings to get the position. I think if their teams have already announced them as SP or RP, even if it hasn't been made official, there are cases like these where we shouldn't have to wait so long. Maybe not SP, but at least the designation "P," which is more flexible and adjustable.
Since we're on the topic, I’d like some clarification on this:
I would like my league to have permanent rights to use the budget. To achieve this, I enabled an option where each team has a budget, and for player acquisitions, managers must allocate part of this budget to the player. Among the managers, it was agreed that the player's budget would be equivalent to the number of points they scored in their last season.
The issue is that this function only activates at the start of the game and deactivates at 8:00 a.m., at which point the players appear as free agents (add) instead of being claimed. I would like to know if there is an option to keep them on waivers or as permanently claimed throughout the season.
Your feelings and what’s fair are two different things. We all abide by fleaflickers rules for eligibility. You ruined many owners strategies because you have no patience.
Flea flicker is not going to put in a claim system for you. You can use the setting that keeps everyone on weekly waivers. That takes two seconds to figure out. You post in this support forum everyday. It’s tiring seeing your complaints or recommendations. Figure it out dude. Fleaflicker doesn’t care about any of us and clearly doesn’t care about any of its rules or else clay holmes would at least retain RP eligibility. They could plan on using a 2B at catcher but that doesn’t mean he should get eligibility right away.
You are an incessant pest who clearly only cares about getting your way. Please don’t respond to me and if I ever see your name in any of my leagues I will be kicking you out accordingly.
Arge2000Tue 3/18/25 2:40 AM
1. The start of the MLB is getting closer, and I still see the same issues—many players remain as free agents, such as Roki Sasaki, who is a starting pitcher tomorrow.
2. It is known that Clay Holmes will be a starter, but the platform still lists him as a reliever, which affects his scoring. Right now, as an internal rule, he is not eligible until he is listed as SP or P.
The_HulkFri 3/21/25 9:20 PM
Hey Fleaflicker, wake up
Arge2000Sat 3/22/25 6:50 AM
Truth be told, I didn't think this topic would generate so much controversy. I apologize to the community; there are people who have been here for a long time. I wasn't aware of the three openings to use him as an SP, but there are leagues where the scoring for RP and SP is different. For example, 1 IP for an SP is 2 points, while for an RP it's 3. Imagine those who asked for Holmes—he will always score above average. Maybe your leagues aren't like that, but mine and many others are, which wouldn't be fair. That's why I asked for that change. Last year, we had to wait for Crochet, Little, Hicks, and even Miller, who took more than the 8 RP outings to get the position. I think if their teams have already announced them as SP or RP, even if it hasn't been made official, there are cases like these where we shouldn't have to wait so long. Maybe not SP, but at least the designation "P," which is more flexible and adjustable.
Since we're on the topic, I’d like some clarification on this:
I would like my league to have permanent rights to use the budget. To achieve this, I enabled an option where each team has a budget, and for player acquisitions, managers must allocate part of this budget to the player. Among the managers, it was agreed that the player's budget would be equivalent to the number of points they scored in their last season.
The issue is that this function only activates at the start of the game and deactivates at 8:00 a.m., at which point the players appear as free agents (add) instead of being claimed. I would like to know if there is an option to keep them on waivers or as permanently claimed throughout the season.
The_HulkSat 3/22/25 2:25 PM
Your feelings and what’s fair are two different things. We all abide by fleaflickers rules for eligibility. You ruined many owners strategies because you have no patience.
Flea flicker is not going to put in a claim system for you. You can use the setting that keeps everyone on weekly waivers. That takes two seconds to figure out. You post in this support forum everyday. It’s tiring seeing your complaints or recommendations. Figure it out dude. Fleaflicker doesn’t care about any of us and clearly doesn’t care about any of its rules or else clay holmes would at least retain RP eligibility. They could plan on using a 2B at catcher but that doesn’t mean he should get eligibility right away.
You are an incessant pest who clearly only cares about getting your way. Please don’t respond to me and if I ever see your name in any of my leagues I will be kicking you out accordingly.
Mario77Mon 3/24/25 12:32 AM
Arge, nobody cares about your leagues. Go kick rocks