osnn_fitz Tue 10/14/08 4:24 PM

In my league, i have the "Power & Playoff Rank Tiebreakers" setup based on: 
 
1) Division Record 
2) Head-to-Head record 
3) Average Points 
 
But my current power rankings would seem to indicate that is not how the power ranking is being processed. Two teams in the same division with the same overall and division record.  
 
They played each other once in head-to-head but the team that won in head-to-head is lower in the power rankings.

osnn_fitz Tue 11/11/08 12:14 PM

still having issues.. 
 
We have two teams in our league in the same division with the same overall (7-3) record.  
 
According to the tiebreakers, it should go with division record first as they are in the same division.. 
 
The one team with a 4-1 division record has a lower power ranking than the team with the 3-2 division record. Even beyond that, if it went to head-to-head record, the team with the 4-1 division record is 1-0 against the other team.

iamgregg Thu 11/13/08 12:12 PM

Is there a team in another division with with a 7-3 record? 
 
If so, a 3 (or more) way tie may be settled on points scored. Thus why the power rankigns would seem the wrong way around. 
 
In their own division it is a 2 way tie, which is settled on divisional record and head-to-head (from what you've said).

osnn_fitz Sun 11/16/08 2:35 AM

yes, there is another 7-3 team in the other division. At that point, in our tie breakers, it goes to head-to-head next and the team in the other division holds the head-to-head tiebreaker against one team and is tied head-to-head with the other 7-3 team. The other 7-3 team has the higher point total and rightly gets ranked higher. 
 
But, at that point, the two remaining 7-3 teams in the same division should have another tie-breaker which goes first to the division record where the 4-1 division revord team *should* be ranked about the 3-2 division record team but is not.

fleafounder Admin Sun 11/16/08 12:50 PM

Power rankings are league-wide and skip the division tiebreaker. 
 
They ignore divisional records to provide a league-wide power rank.

osnn_fitz Sun 11/16/08 1:44 PM

but shouldn't it still go by head-to-head record? head-to-head, the team that is ranked 4th in power record has beaten the team ranked 3rd in head-to-head

osnn_fitz Sun 11/16/08 8:06 PM

well, i kind of see what's going on. It ties back to the total order thing.. 
A beat B, B beat C, but C beat A.. so it goes to the PF to break the 3 way tie 
 
And Team A rightly gets the highest ranking. My question then goes to the remaining two teams, does the PF tie-breaker continue? shouldn't it get reset to break the tie between the remaining teams B and C?

fleafounder Admin Mon 11/17/08 10:35 AM

Currently Fleaflicker does not revert back to the first step because the PF tiebreaker can be used to order all the teams. 
 
However, it's an interesting point. The NFL's rules aren't entirely clear on this. 
 
If two clubs remain tied after third or other clubs are eliminated during any step, tie breaker reverts to step 1 of the two-club format. 
 
But it also says 
 
When the first Wild-Card team has been identified, the procedure is repeated to name the second Wild-Card.

osnn_fitz Tue 11/18/08 12:02 AM

My take on that is that if there are 4 teams tied, it goes through that tie breakers without resetting until there are only 2 teams left at which point it resets back to the two-club tie breaker format.