Taysom Hill is highest projected points player for this week at WR.... Drops Davante Adams to #2... A joke... If you can change him to QB/WR as of two days ago, you can make it right by listing him as QB.

He’s been a QB/WR all season long. Not just two days ago. That’s one reason lots of teams stashed him in case this very thing happened. To change it now would ruin that earlier strategy.

I had to drop 2 useful players to pick up Hill so they better not change it!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He was only QB in drafts in the Spring though. Also, last year he was just a QB. In dynasty he was not that valuable with just the QB designation last season once they signed Winston, and before his position switch. Dropped him in two leagues. He was my fourth or fifth QB in one, but would have been third WR. The other, a team I took over, he would have been a top player on my team but was buried behind Carr and Tannehil

l on the QB chart.

To other comments, QB/RB designation is ridiculous. There has always been running QBs that get their points equally or more on the ground and just labeled QB. Cunningham, Vick, Newton, more before that too I know but I am sticking more modern era. Nowadays dual threat QBs are becoming the norm. Hell, even my man Carr is running more than ever. What, are we going to make every mobile QB a QB/RB?

I agree SackSabbath and I think you are missing the point I am seeing. Which is IF LAMAR was already a RB/QB designation when you drafted him, it CHANGED the value of his output potential and caused you to value him much HIGHER than normal quarterbacks... and to have it changed after the fact cannot UNDO your already spent logic on the earlier decision to have drafted him higher based on that designation.

THERE SHOULD NEVER EVER BE A DUAL POSITION DESIGNATION! For any player.

Hill should be changed to QB or WR or TE position immediately before week 12.

Problem solved.

On the Saints homepage Taysom Hill is listed as a QB ONLY. Therefore he should ONLY be eligible for QB ir superflex. Fleaflicker changed him from QB to QB WR when the Saints changed him. In all FAIRNESS they should change him back to just QB just as the Saints did. Otherwise their logic for the first change is invalid AND VIOLATES all of their position policies.

If flea flicker changes it I will gladly and MOST humbly play along. You won't see me crying about it the way the first wave of managers have cried about it.. that's for sure. I will just before that -- Flea Flicker anticipated exactly what I am arguing for -- based on their initial RULES of "we will never remove a status designation after it's been posted" declaration on their rules page... so I agree it's a cluster-eff nightmare because they gave him a WR / QB double designation to begin with.

I am 100 percent fine to submit to flea-flickers app on their change should they make it. I will just maintain forever I think their decision was WRONG based on their already PUBLISHED RULES and unfairly dictates dollars being awarded in home leagues all over who chose to research and follow those rules THEY posted to begin with!

Yahoo got it the MOST Right I think by just making him a QB only to begin with. (To be clear. That's what I truly think.) But given the dual designation, I just think it's most fair to keep it there since we cannot UNDO all the player adds and drops to acquire him and didn't have the PREFACE as ESPN leagues had ahead of time that "we may change this designation later..." Had there been that designation then I woudn't have posted one message because then Flea Flicker could make the change willy nilly and I would have READ THAT AHEAD OF TIME.

And to be clear .... OF COURSE I have Taysom Hill at WR in 3 leagues!! But again, in the league I want to win the most -- I don't have him and think I should have to beat the team who does have him at WR with my team!