This is "fantasy' football, not "cheat code" football. The Saints can't dress more than one QB at a time, so a Fantasy team shouldn't be able to dress an extra QB in a WR slot either. Super messed up Flea.
BOTTOM LINE QUESTION: Can an owner play Taysom Hill in a FLEX SPOT (RB/WR/TE) even though he is announced as the starting QB and thus an owner would be starting TWO QBs.....One at the normal QB position, plus Hill in the FLEX. I agree with DBon that a team cannot be allowed to start TWO QB's!
We need a logical explanation Flea. Your cut&paste below is weak.
The logical explanation is he’s been a multi designation player all season. That means owners who stashed a roster spot anticipating this very scenario gained their advantage this week when it did indeed come to fruition. Everyone in your league had the fair opportunity to risk this for their team. To change it now would damage your league in ways you’re not realizing. The owners who stashed HILL a week or two ago may have instead claimed players on waivers that you ended up claiming. But instead used the multi designation in their factors in deciding who to claim.
If you remove the ability to place Hill in WR after the fact then you unfairly hurt the managers who made their decisions based on anticipating the ability to do this.
Those who don’t like it are missing the above issues in the strategic play to have stashed him.
That is terrible logic. Nobody had him stashed. Nobody. Hill was a quick pickup this week bc owners saw a loophole. An illegal loophole. Players need to carry ONE designated position. Lamar Jackson should be designated as a RB/QB with your logic. Play him at flex and another QB as usual.... Why not that?
No that's not even relevant to the argument Jo-MAma. My logic and argument is more like, IF LAMAR WAS ALREADY designated as a RB/QB and you had your draft, wouldn't it CHANGE HIS VALUE drastically if you drafted him and then it got taken away? Surely you see that's what I am saying, right?
CMCOCHOFri 11/20/20 10:25 AM
Will Taysom Hill continue to be eligible for QB and WR slot given that he was just announced as a starting QB?
DBonFri 11/20/20 8:51 PM
This is "fantasy' football, not "cheat code" football. The Saints can't dress more than one QB at a time, so a Fantasy team shouldn't be able to dress an extra QB in a WR slot either. Super messed up Flea.
Jo-MAmaFri 11/20/20 10:29 PM
BOTTOM LINE QUESTION: Can an owner play Taysom Hill in a FLEX SPOT (RB/WR/TE) even though he is announced as the starting QB and thus an owner would be starting TWO QBs.....One at the normal QB position, plus Hill in the FLEX. I agree with DBon that a team cannot be allowed to start TWO QB's!
We need a logical explanation Flea. Your cut&paste below is weak.
JimNayziumSun 11/22/20 2:26 PM
The logical explanation is he’s been a multi designation player all season. That means owners who stashed a roster spot anticipating this very scenario gained their advantage this week when it did indeed come to fruition. Everyone in your league had the fair opportunity to risk this for their team. To change it now would damage your league in ways you’re not realizing. The owners who stashed HILL a week or two ago may have instead claimed players on waivers that you ended up claiming. But instead used the multi designation in their factors in deciding who to claim.
If you remove the ability to place Hill in WR after the fact then you unfairly hurt the managers who made their decisions based on anticipating the ability to do this.
Those who don’t like it are missing the above issues in the strategic play to have stashed him.
Jo-MAmaSun 11/22/20 4:13 PM
That is terrible logic. Nobody had him stashed. Nobody. Hill was a quick pickup this week bc owners saw a loophole. An illegal loophole. Players need to carry ONE designated position. Lamar Jackson should be designated as a RB/QB with your logic. Play him at flex and another QB as usual.... Why not that?
JimNayziumMon 11/23/20 3:36 PM
No that's not even relevant to the argument Jo-MAma. My logic and argument is more like, IF LAMAR WAS ALREADY designated as a RB/QB and you had your draft, wouldn't it CHANGE HIS VALUE drastically if you drafted him and then it got taken away? Surely you see that's what I am saying, right?