1. The start of the MLB is getting closer, and I still see the same issues—many players remain as free agents, such as Roki Sasaki, who is a starting pitcher tomorrow.
2. It is known that Clay Holmes will be a starter, but the platform still lists him as a reliever, which affects his scoring. Right now, as an internal rule, he is not eligible until he is listed as SP or P.
Holmes had 67 RP appearances last year, zero starts.
Per the Owner's Manual:
Pitchers qualify for new positions:
If they made at least 3 starts for SP (starting pitcher) eligibility this season.
And if they made at least 8 relief appearances for RP (relief pitcher) eligibility this season.
@fleafounder, why are you going against your own posted rules?
People research and draft based on the rules you have established. Please re-instate Holmes' RP eligibility.
Arge2000 isn't the only player on the platform. Changes like this affect everyone. And removing eligibility after drafts are over and games have started is unconscionable. Follow your own rules.
Clay Holmes should have RP eligibility. He pitched strictly as an RP last year. Please don’t change things on a whim when one person comments. He needs to have RP eligibility per your rules.
How come Wilson Contreras isn't listed as 1b? It's STL intention to play him there.
Why did Clay Holmes get this special treatment (a position change based on the team's intentions but before actually accruing starts at the position) and other players did not?
Please make it the same standards for all players. And if that standard is different than the listed rules, please update the rules..
You need to fix this and make him a RP or P. He has not earned SP yet. Many people drafted him as a RP for him to be a SPRP. Making this change after most drafts have happened is asinine. The majority of people here agree he should be a RP or P. Fix this now, Fleaflicker.
Arge2000Tue 3/18/25 2:40 AM
1. The start of the MLB is getting closer, and I still see the same issues—many players remain as free agents, such as Roki Sasaki, who is a starting pitcher tomorrow.
2. It is known that Clay Holmes will be a starter, but the platform still lists him as a reliever, which affects his scoring. Right now, as an internal rule, he is not eligible until he is listed as SP or P.
phlowtationThu 3/20/25 3:03 PM
Holmes had 67 RP appearances last year, zero starts.
Per the Owner's Manual:
Pitchers qualify for new positions:
If they made at least 3 starts for SP (starting pitcher) eligibility this season.
And if they made at least 8 relief appearances for RP (relief pitcher) eligibility this season.
@fleafounder, why are you going against your own posted rules?
People research and draft based on the rules you have established. Please re-instate Holmes' RP eligibility.
Arge2000 isn't the only player on the platform. Changes like this affect everyone. And removing eligibility after drafts are over and games have started is unconscionable. Follow your own rules.
Mario77Thu 3/20/25 1:54 PM
Clay Holmes is not a starter.
The_HulkThu 3/20/25 1:50 PM
Clay Holmes should have RP eligibility. He pitched strictly as an RP last year. Please don’t change things on a whim when one person comments. He needs to have RP eligibility per your rules.
hollywood_22Tue 3/25/25 10:32 AM
How come Wilson Contreras isn't listed as 1b? It's STL intention to play him there.
Why did Clay Holmes get this special treatment (a position change based on the team's intentions but before actually accruing starts at the position) and other players did not?
Please make it the same standards for all players. And if that standard is different than the listed rules, please update the rules..
loubonzThu 3/20/25 1:47 PM
why would we change this?
the player/owner should have waited for the eligibility to take place naturally as its already built
some leagues play to this advantage. He should be listed as a (P)
fleafounder AdminTue 3/18/25 9:51 AM
Thanks we'll get these fixed
Arge2000Wed 3/19/25 5:09 AM
Thank you very much, I hope you continue like this and keep improving the platform—for me, it's the best.
loubonzSat 3/22/25 11:52 PM
@fleafounder
where are we on putting this back to RP or P?
ColeClaybournSun 3/23/25 8:43 PM
You need to fix this and make him a RP or P. He has not earned SP yet. Many people drafted him as a RP for him to be a SPRP. Making this change after most drafts have happened is asinine. The majority of people here agree he should be a RP or P. Fix this now, Fleaflicker.