It would be nice to have Keeper limits set by the system rules options and not have to worry about the commissioner having to manually edit your roster. I might make a mistake and the commissioner edit my roster and for me to lose a player, where if a system rule was in place I would know when I try to make the change. I wish FleaFlicker would implement the change requested by the original poster. They already have a similar feat for position limits... I just wish they would extend this to keeper limits.
We have a two-player keeper league right now and we're interested in expanding the keeper rules but I'm having a tough time getting everyone on board since it's not an automated system. It'd be great to have a flexible keeper league model in place so that we could ensure that rules are being enforced. Definitely the top improvement that people in my league want to see.
We have been doing this manually for a few years now. We only allow 2 keepers of different positions. This creates a lot of trading of players and draft picks pre draft. It would be great to have a system implementation so the commish doesn't have to police it.
Understandable point, but I have found that the best way to handle it is to select the right ownership and the rest all falls into place.
If you have solid honorable guys in your leagues and you all agree to certain rules, then except for the occassional honest mistake, they all do a pretty good job opf policing each other.
This is a great idea and something that I think should be higher on the priority list but then again I have no idea what improvements are being worked on so maybe it shouldn't be lol...
Pee-DeeWed 8/26/09 5:11 AM
I think a nice feature to add for next year would be the ability to set a limit of players per position.
Lets say I have a 15 keeper league I would like to set limits as shown below.
RB Max = 4
WR Max = 4
QB Max = 2
TE Max =2
DB Max = 4
LB Max = 4
DL Max = 4
DEF Max =2
K Max = 2
WR/RB/TE Max = 7
DB/RB/DL Max = 8
Just an Idea... anyone?
Pee-DeeSun 4/22/12 10:20 PM
I HAVE A DREAM!!!
Pee-DeeTue 4/17/12 11:01 PM
Oh... here it is... Been on the request list since 2009. Come on man! Three years!!!
rangerdaveWed 4/18/12 2:34 PM
I believe it is in the works, but no guarantee for inclusion before the start of the 2012 season.
Pee-DeeWed 4/18/12 5:08 PM
If they aren't working on a kick ass apk, then I will be pissed if I have to wait for a forth year for something that shouldn't be too hard to code.
Pee-DeeWed 4/18/12 5:11 PM
I want my keeper limits, but I would gladly do without if they offered a solid Android app.
Pee-DeeFri 7/30/10 8:05 AM
Is this going to happen???
scotto1959Fri 7/30/10 2:48 PM
NEVER!!!!! Got any openings this year?
PortgazSun 8/1/10 11:53 AM
If he would get off his lazy ass and kick one of the two inactive teams.
PortgazMon 7/19/10 12:12 PM
It would be nice to have Keeper limits set by the system rules options and not have to worry about the commissioner having to manually edit your roster. I might make a mistake and the commissioner edit my roster and for me to lose a player, where if a system rule was in place I would know when I try to make the change. I wish FleaFlicker would implement the change requested by the original poster. They already have a similar feat for position limits... I just wish they would extend this to keeper limits.
Mel_DronbergerSun 6/13/10 12:57 PM
We have a two-player keeper league right now and we're interested in expanding the keeper rules but I'm having a tough time getting everyone on board since it's not an automated system. It'd be great to have a flexible keeper league model in place so that we could ensure that rules are being enforced. Definitely the top improvement that people in my league want to see.
PicklepeteSat 6/12/10 11:11 PM
Yeah.. Let each lg decide how they want to set keeper limits.
sigeptoastSat 6/12/10 7:39 AM
We have been doing this manually for a few years now. We only allow 2 keepers of different positions. This creates a lot of trading of players and draft picks pre draft. It would be great to have a system implementation so the commish doesn't have to police it.
VaBhodiSun 6/13/10 10:25 AM
Understandable point, but I have found that the best way to handle it is to select the right ownership and the rest all falls into place.
If you have solid honorable guys in your leagues and you all agree to certain rules, then except for the occassional honest mistake, they all do a pretty good job opf policing each other.
[Deleted User]Sat 5/29/10 3:45 PM
This is a great idea and something that I think should be higher on the priority list but then again I have no idea what improvements are being worked on so maybe it shouldn't be lol...