FF staff, I know that deciding what positions rookies will play in the pros isn't easy, but at this point I'm pretty sure Stanley Johnson won't be overtaking Reggie Jackson for the starting PG job in Detroit. With Stanley Johnson counting against 4 different positional limits, I haven't been able to make any adds or drops since the season started.
Thanks for the swift response. I'm thinking he should be solely a SF at this point. Van Gundy hasn't exactly experimented with him at SG yet, but it seems inevitable that he spend some time there as well. What I was trying to say is that he has not played a single minute this season at PG or PF, so I think those two positions should be taken away.
Oh boy... Let me put it this way, in this league, you can only have 7 PG, 7 SG, 7 SF, 7 PF, and 7 C. Stanley Johnson counts as FOUR players here. He counts against FOUR different positional limits simultaneously. For example, right now I'm at the limit for PF because Stanley has inexplicably been listed as once, so I couldn't pounce on Pau Gasol when some sorry owner dropped him because I was at the limit for PF.
Why are you so insistent on going against the grain here when you have such a loose grasp of the situation? A lot of these rookies have incorrect designations. We're one week into the season; it should be addressed.
playerpianoSun 11/1/15 10:58 PM
FF staff, I know that deciding what positions rookies will play in the pros isn't easy, but at this point I'm pretty sure Stanley Johnson won't be overtaking Reggie Jackson for the starting PG job in Detroit. With Stanley Johnson counting against 4 different positional limits, I haven't been able to make any adds or drops since the season started.
FleaflickerT AdminMon 11/2/15 4:43 PM
Hello!
We have him as a G/F, and he is on the Pistons roster as a Forward. What position are you suggesting he be placed at?
playerpianoMon 11/2/15 5:45 PM
Thanks for the swift response. I'm thinking he should be solely a SF at this point. Van Gundy hasn't exactly experimented with him at SG yet, but it seems inevitable that he spend some time there as well. What I was trying to say is that he has not played a single minute this season at PG or PF, so I think those two positions should be taken away.
michiganctMon 11/2/15 7:14 PM
g/f is just fine dude, how could possible complain about that?
playerpianoMon 11/2/15 9:42 PM
Our league has positional limits. He counts against 4 different positional maximums. It's crippling my ability to make roster changes.
michiganctTue 11/3/15 8:50 AM
Why would he count against FOUR if he's in your lineup for only one position.
playerpianoTue 11/3/15 9:41 AM
Oh boy... Let me put it this way, in this league, you can only have 7 PG, 7 SG, 7 SF, 7 PF, and 7 C. Stanley Johnson counts as FOUR players here. He counts against FOUR different positional limits simultaneously. For example, right now I'm at the limit for PF because Stanley has inexplicably been listed as once, so I couldn't pounce on Pau Gasol when some sorry owner dropped him because I was at the limit for PF.
Why are you so insistent on going against the grain here when you have such a loose grasp of the situation? A lot of these rookies have incorrect designations. We're one week into the season; it should be addressed.
michiganctSun 11/22/15 6:10 PM
i could careless about the limits. The fact I can play him any where is a huge advantage.
playerpianoSun 11/22/15 7:49 PM
^So let's give Roy Hibbert PG eligibility, right?
This website can be so full of trash sometimes. We're a month in and you're still sorting out roster issues. What gives?