I wanted to reach out to you and ask how you determine position eligibilty. Almost every roster in my league is now not compliant with the roster requirements because a good chunk of the top players are being given eligibility in a position they have never played. For example, Auston Matthews is RW eligible, on his profile page it says under games 39 C. Clearly he has never played a full game at RW. Mikko Rantanen is C eligible, on his profile page it says under games 41 RW, same scenario as Matthews. There are atleast 5 guys on my roster that have eligibility for a position they have never played. Will this be changed in the future.
FranchiseFrenzySun 2/6/22 9:16 AM
To whom it may concern,
I wanted to reach out to you and ask how you determine position eligibilty. Almost every roster in my league is now not compliant with the roster requirements because a good chunk of the top players are being given eligibility in a position they have never played. For example, Auston Matthews is RW eligible, on his profile page it says under games 39 C. Clearly he has never played a full game at RW. Mikko Rantanen is C eligible, on his profile page it says under games 41 RW, same scenario as Matthews. There are atleast 5 guys on my roster that have eligibility for a position they have never played. Will this be changed in the future.
Regards,
Evan