Our league reviews all trades via veto (5) - We have a player who has had a couple of trades vetoed already and now just pulled off the following trade (because it's a holiday weekend there was not enough veto's - plus he campaigns to justify his trades) - Is this fair trade?
4-6 players gives up Lynch (bye)/Fitz/Hou D for Murray (IR)/Mathews(questionable)/Pitt D (bottom half D) and Bowe (WR5) - I argued that this was an unfair trade and that there should've been at least a starting RB included that was assured of playing this weekend since Lynch was on a bye.
Is this a fair trade or not? The reason behind the trade was supposedly to give the player 4-6 a chance to win this week - Oh and the player who traded Murray also owns Jones (who starting this weekend). . .To me it STINKS of collusion. . .