I think Weeden has played pretty well considering the lack of talent at WR, but your right TRich would produce more on a better team. I really like Martin (I have both TRich and Hamsta) but at least in my league, Trent is ranked 3rd among RB's and Martin 7th. Per game average is about the same as Trent still has his bye coming up. So I'd say they've been pretty even this year and both RB's are producing on not-so-good teams.
The Bucs have one more win than the Browns, your logic if severely flawed. Not to mention T Rich is ranked higher than Doug Martin. Don't post unless you know what you're talking about.
I like to institute the "wins-losses", or percentage rule for posts on Fleaflicker. Click the person's name, like "Thatman". He's below 50% wins, so you ignore him. Easy, effective, personal rule.
On of my leagues isn't being played but it's active, so once again someone with flawed logic and lack of grammar.
"He say" T Rich would be competing for league if on a better team, I say being ranked 5th overall and only being 15 pts. away from the leader is competing for league leader status. Grow up children.
Comments
Gronk-Want-BallSat 11/3/12 1:15 PM
If Trent was on a better team with decent wr's and not a 28year old rookie QB, his numbers would contend for league leader. IE Doug Martin
TouchdownBundySat 11/3/12 2:46 PM
I think Weeden has played pretty well considering the lack of talent at WR, but your right TRich would produce more on a better team. I really like Martin (I have both TRich and Hamsta) but at least in my league, Trent is ranked 3rd among RB's and Martin 7th. Per game average is about the same as Trent still has his bye coming up. So I'd say they've been pretty even this year and both RB's are producing on not-so-good teams.
ThatManSat 11/3/12 5:16 PM
The Bucs have one more win than the Browns, your logic if severely flawed. Not to mention T Rich is ranked higher than Doug Martin. Don't post unless you know what you're talking about.
TommeltotSun 11/4/12 8:47 AM
you need to think before talking. he say he contend for league leader on a better team... witch is right.
and saying that win = better team (wr+qb) is just stupid.
he clearly know more then you "thatMan"
YoungKeeseySun 11/4/12 9:27 AM
I like to institute the "wins-losses", or percentage rule for posts on Fleaflicker. Click the person's name, like "Thatman". He's below 50% wins, so you ignore him. Easy, effective, personal rule.
YoungKeeseySun 11/4/12 9:28 AM
And before anyone says anything, yes, my record isn't great. BUT instead of offering FF help, I'm offering something better!
ThatManSun 11/4/12 9:42 AM
On of my leagues isn't being played but it's active, so once again someone with flawed logic and lack of grammar.
"He say" T Rich would be competing for league if on a better team, I say being ranked 5th overall and only being 15 pts. away from the leader is competing for league leader status. Grow up children.
SuperBraceroSun 11/4/12 10:06 AM
She got a big booty so I call her big booty!
bustnheadsMon 11/5/12 2:10 AM
Lmao! I like that!
bustnheadsMon 11/5/12 2:12 AM
U started it!
TommeltotMon 11/5/12 6:10 AM
True. But i think he have some problems whit him self. Let the geek rage
bustnheadsMon 11/5/12 11:33 AM
I meant thatman started it. I'm bad at replying to the specific message
papa14Sat 11/3/12 3:59 AM
Hes still a monster