I have a guy who has not keptin conformity withmy leagues min and max at each position rules. He should have had a warning and then rec'd zero points if he didn't conform. Please let me know why this is happenning, I set up these rules for a reason.
You are right, there should definitely be an option to disqualify teams that fail to meet the minimum roster requirements.
I'll do my best to add it within the next few weeks.
In the meantime, we've added clear warnings on the team page when the lineup fails to meet the roster requirements.
I guess there is no point of having a minimum then? I will have to try to badger this guy to make a transaction by the end of the week and will have to look at each players roster at the end of each week myself to make sure they are following the rules. Kinda a pain in the ass, and will definitely lead to a controversy. The big warning will be a help though, thanks.
Fleaflicker does not actively enforce roster minimums. If you execute a transaction that violates a minimum, you see a warning after executing the transaction.
Maximums cannot be violated under any circumstances. If you think there's a roster that violates maximum roster requirements, let us know--this would be a serious problem.
We don't currently support disqualifying teams that fail to meet roster minimums. We will support it next season.
For now, you can monitor this yourself and let us know if you want us to make changes to your standings:
In the meantime, I will change the team page so that it displays a clear warning any time a roster fails to meet a minimum. This will make it more obvious I hope. (I'll add an update here once we add that feature.)
If you have other suggestions, please let me know.